OrbitalWiki vs CelesTrak

The long-running public source for orbital element sets and the satellite catalog, run as a non-profit. No account, no key, and the files are updated continuously.

CelesTrak is upstream of this catalog. We read its data, we do not replace it. For the authoritative figures, go to CelesTrak directly. See every source

Side by side with CelesTrak

Comparison of satellite data providers
FeatureOrbitalWikiCelesTrak
Run byOrbitalWikiDr. T.S. Kelso, CelesTrak (501(c)(3) non-profit)
Account requiredNoNo
Machine-readable APIYesYes
Bulk downloadYesYes
Free limitNo key needed to read; 1,000 requests a day with a free keyNo published number; a usage policy applies
Data termsODbL-1.0, attribution requiredCelesTrak usage policy
Per-field source shownYesNo

Provider documentation checked 2026-08-03.

When to use CelesTrak instead

For the orbital elements themselves. CelesTrak is upstream of this catalog and updates faster than we do, so if you are propagating orbits, screening conjunctions, or you need the freshest element set, take it from CelesTrak. It also carries data we do not republish, including supplemental element sets and conjunction reports.

Go to CelesTrak

When this catalog helps

When the question is about the object rather than its orbit. CelesTrak tells you where something is; it does not set out to reconcile who operates it against another catalog. If you need an operator name, a mission identity, or a record of where a value came from, that reconciliation is the part this site does.

Common questions

Is OrbitalWiki a replacement for CelesTrak?
No. CelesTrak is one of the sources this catalog is built from. It stays the better choice for orbital elements; this site adds identity and provenance on top of them.
Does CelesTrak need an API key?
No. CelesTrak serves its data files openly, with a usage policy asking you not to hammer the servers. There is no registration step.
Can I redistribute CelesTrak data?
CelesTrak publishes a usage policy that governs this. Read it before redistributing, and cite CelesTrak either way.

Compare with something else